Regional ETS Paper Abstract

Next month, Beeson Divinity School is hosting the ETS Southeast Meeting. I’m looking forward to this conference for two reasons. First, Daniel Treier is speaking on the Theological Interpretation of Scripture. Second, my paper was recently accepted.

Here is more information: Register here

“The Theological
Interpretation of Scripture”

Daniel Treier, Plenary Speaker
March 21-22, 2014

Beeson Divinity School, Samford University
Birmingham, Alabama

Steven Runge (Discourse Grammar of the Greek NT; blog) was very formidable in the shaping of this paper. Greek syntax and linguistic theory is of great interest to me (ultimately, not enough to pursue PhD studies). His model has satisfied the majority of my questions surrounding the Historical Present. So, I decided to provide a brief history of research surrounding the Historical Present and use John 13 as a test case for Levinsohn/Runge’s model.

Here is my abstract:

Revisiting the Historical Present: John 13 as a Test Case for the Prominence of Discourse Features

Shawn J. Wilhite

Southern Seminary, Kentucky

ABSTRACT: Even though multiple theories exist regarding the function of the HP, they are nearly unanimous on defining past referring Present verbs as Historical Presents. Traditional grammars and recent monographs define the Historical Present (HP) in different ways. Many (including Wallace and Fanning) argue for vivid narration. Others (Kiparsky and Reynolds) contend the HP reduces the verbal aspect to zero and adjusts the tense to past time. Aspect-only proponents argue the HP as unmarked-remote imperfectivity (Porter, Decker) or imperfective-proximity spill-over from the discourse (Campbell). Using John 13 as a test case, I demonstrate how the HP is a pragmatic function of Present verb. This study will show how the HP helps readers process the discourse (cataphorically highlights speeches or actions, and introduces new characters) or has pragmatic functions in the discourse (builds tension and crescendos the narrative). Discourse features, then, take prominence leaving semantic features in the background.


One thought on “Regional ETS Paper Abstract

  1. Pingback: Identifying the Elect: Peter’s Use of Metaphor and Scripture in 1 Peter 1:22-25 | Trey Moss

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s